Sunday, February 22, 2015

Jesus The Jew? by Crossfire



Jesus the Jew

It’s easy to forget sometimes that Jesus wasn’t a Christian. Despite his revolutionary teachings and heterodox approaches, he was considered a Jewish Rabbi, or teacher. This means he understood Judaism with a richness and depth that few others had. So why do so many Christians know so little about their own Jewish heritage?
By Christian Piatt  from  http://myjesusproject.com/my-mentors/

Crossfire:  What is wrong with the quote above?   Let me count the errors!  Let us begin at the start.  

     “Jesus the Jew”, First of all no one ever called Him “Jesus” when He walked this earth.  It is not even a translation of His name, the translators are responsible for changing His name when translating the Bible into English.  There are no “J”’s in Hebrew. Yahshua the Christ (Christ is a title and not His name) came in His Father’s name.  What part of “Jesus” is His Father’s name?  Some may argue that means that He came in His Father’s authority.  While it is true that He did, He also came with His Father’s name (just as I came with my Father’s name, His last name)  Many people, at the time were called by their father’s name (in some countries they still are).  Example, some people had the word “Ben” and then their father’s name following it to indicate that they were the son of whatever the name was.  "ben" and "bin" are called cognates (words that share similar language roots). They mean "son of" in Hebrew & Arabic respectively.   Using that form, I could have been known as Son of Carl, or Son of Hart ( which is actually done by my sharing my father’s last name, Hart ).

 The Bible tells us the short form of God’s name.   “Sing unto God, sing praises to his name: extol him that rideth upon the heavens by his name JAH, and rejoice before him.” Psalms 68:4  The word “JAH” is Strong’s # 3050, .   Yahh,  yaw   contraction for 3068, and meaning the same; Jah, the sacred name:--Jah, the Lord, most vehement. Compare names in "-iah," "- jah." Keep in mind that there are no “J”’s in Hebrews, note that #3050 is Yahh pronounced yaw (the self-existant)  .  I believe that it is short for Yahweh and that Christ name is “Yahshua”  (which means the self existent ones provided salvation / God’s Salvation).  Some have mis-spelled His name as “yeshua”, which I do not believe to be correct and have some information on that, but let’s not chase rabbits.  Note: when we sing the song Hallelujah, we pronounce the jah as yah,  Praise Ye the Lord, understanding that the “Lord” is Yahweh, therefore we are saying Praise ye Yahweh.

      Next, for “Jesus” to be a “Jew” or Judean, He would have to been the son of Joseph and not the Son of God.  What about His mother?  The best I have been able to find is that she was a Levite and not a Judean.  She was a virgin vessel, He came in the form of man, but not from man.  He was not called a Jew, by those who knew Him, but as a Judean (resident of Judea).  Here we could go into the Bible’s genealogy and look at various verses, but it is simple if we remember that He is the Son of God.  

     Jesus wasn’t a Christian” ?  To me that is like saying Christ was not Christ (some do not believe that He was).  Or it would be like saying that He did not believe in the words that He spoke.  Christianity is based upon Christ, His person, His words, His life, and His gift to us.  While it is true that He was not a follower of Himself, His word is true and is the founder of Christianity. To say Jesus wasn’t a Christian”, is misleading.

      he was considered a Jewish Rabbi, or teacher  He was not a “Jewish Rabbi”.  While the word “rabbi” does mean teacher, He was not a teacher of Judaism, which is what is inferred by the term “Jewish Rabbi”.  The only time the word “Jewish” is used in the Bible is in Titus 1:14 “Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth.” The word “Jewish”, in that verse is Strong’s # 2451.  Ioudaikos,  ee-oo-dah-ee-kos'  from 2453; Judaic, i.e. resembling a Judaean:--Jewish.  Note that it is “Judaic” or “resembling a  Judaean” and does not mean someone from the tribe of Judah.  At that time there were lots of different people living in Judaea.  Note also that the word is from Strong’s # 03054.   yahad,  yaw-had'  denominative from a form corresponding to 3061; to Judaize, i.e. become Jewish:--become Jews.  You cannot become a race, therefore it has to do with their customs and beliefs rather than their linage.  The word “fables” in Titus 1:14  (#3454) means  “fiction” or "myth".  The only time “Jewish” is used in the Bible is referring to their fables, fiction, myths.    The point is that “Jewish Rabbi” has to do with Judaism and Christ had some very harsh words to say about the founders of Judaism (see Matthew Chapter 23).

            “. . . Judaism . . . Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism.  But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered . . . “
          from page XXI of “Pharisees, The Sociological Background of  Their Faith”, first edition.  by Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, the head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, often referred to as “ The Vatican of Judaism “

"The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud mark the end of Hebrewism and the beginning of Judaism."
[Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, formerly the Chief Rabbi of the United States  as quoted in the article by Bertrand L. Comparet  The Bible is not a Jewish Book”]

     ‘This means he understood Judaism with a richness and depth that few others had.”  The statement seems to infer that Christ was a “Jewish Rabbi” teaching Judaism.  Yes He did understand Judaism (even before the name had been coined) and that is why he rebuked it so strongly in the 23rd Chapter of Matthew.  Need I say more?

“So why do so many Christians know so little about their own Jewish heritage?”  The Christian’sJewish heritage” is a fable, fiction or myth.  Christianity has no “Jewish heritage”, it is misinformation that has been repeated over and over again in an attempt to deceive Christians into believing it and there by Judaizing  Christianity.  Salt cannot be destroyed but it can be made useless by deluding it with something else, like sand.  This is what has been happening to Christianity for many years.  Many, otherwise good, preachers, teachers, laymen, and “Christian” authors, have, without even realizing it, helped to Judaize Christianity, making it useless and mixed with errors.

“Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.” Matthew 5:13

     Statements, like the one at the beginning of this article a far too common and it is these errors that I endeavor to correct.  Let Christ’s church return to Him. #

No comments: